毕业论文移动版

最后，再次感谢所有在我做毕业设计时给予我帮助的人，包括我的家人和朋友。

                                                     2016年5月3日

外 文 翻 译

英文部分

Web MVC with the Spring Framework 

Juergen Hoeller 

1。      Introduction: Spring the Application Framework 

When first confronted with the Spring Framework, one might be tempted to think: "Oh no, not yet another web framework"。 This article will outline why Spring isn't particularly a web framework but a generic lightweight application framework with dedicated web support, and show the architectural differences to Struts and WebWork 

In contrast to Struts or WebWork, Spring is an application framework for all layers: It offers a bean configuration foundation, AOP support, a JDBC abstraction framework, abstract transaction support, etc。 It is a very non-intrusive effort: Your application classes do not need to depend on any Spring classes if not necessary, and you can reuse every part on its own if you like to。 From its very design, the framework encourages clean separation of tiers, most importantly web tier and business logic: e。g。 the validation framework does not depend on web controllers。 Major goals are reusability and testability: Unnecessary container or framework dependencies can be considered avoidable evils。 

Of course, Spring's own web support is nicely integrated with the 

framework's general patterns。 Nevertheless, replacing the web solution with Struts, WebWork, or the like is easy。 Both with Spring's web support or a different one, Spring allows for building a true dedicated middle tier in the web container, with the option to reuse exactly the same business logic in test environments or standalone applications。 And within J2EE, your business logic will not unnecessarily depend on 

container services like JTA or EJB - allowing complex, well-architected web applications to run in a "simple" container like Tomcat or Resin。 Note that Spring doesn't generally aim to compete with existing solutions。 It rather fosters seamless integration with standards like Servlet, JSP, JTA, JNDI, JDBC, and JDO, and well-suited tools like Hibernate, Velocity, Log4J, and Caucho's Hessian/Burlap。 The framework is designed to grow with the needs of your applications, in terms of technology choice: For example, you will probably use JTA via Spring's JtaTransactionManager if you need distributed transactions - but only then, as there are perfect 

replacements for single databases, like DataSourceTransactionManager or HibernateTransactionManager。 

2。      Web MVC: The Design of Spring's Web Framework 

Spring's web framework is designed around a DispatcherServlet that dispatches requests to handlers, with configurable handler mappings, view resolution, and locale and theme resolution。 The default handler is a very simple Controller interface, just offering a "ModelAndView 

handleRequest(request,response)" method。 This can already be used for application controllers, but you will prefer the included implementation hierarchy, consisting of AbstractController, AbstractCommandController, MultiActionController, SimpleFormController,  AbstractWizardFormController。 Application controllers will typically be subclasses of those。 Note that you can choose an appropriate base class: If you don't have a form, you don't need a FormController。 This is a major difference to Struts。  You can take any object as command or form object: There's no need to implement an interface or derive from a base class。 Spring's data binding is highly flexible, e。g。 it treats type mismatches as validation errors that can be evaluated by the application, not as system errors。 So you don't need to duplicate your business objects' properties as Strings in your form objects, just to be able to handle invalid submissions, or to convert the Strings properly。 Instead, it's often preferable to bind directly to your business objects。 This is another major difference to Struts which is built around required base classes like Action and ActionForm - for every type of action。  Compared to WebWork, Spring has more differentiated object roles: It supports the notion of a Controller, an optional command or form object, and a model that gets passed to the view。 The model will normally include the command or form object but also arbitrary reference data。 Instead, a WebWork Action combines all those roles into one single object。 WebWork does allow you to use existing business objects as part of your form, but just by making them bean properties of the respective Action class。 Finally, the same Action instance that handles the request gets used for evaluation and form population in the view。 Thus, reference data needs to be modelled as bean properties of the Action too。 These are arguably too many roles in one object。  Regarding views: Spring's view resolution is extremely flexible。 A Controller implementation can even write a view directly to the response, returning null as ModelAndView。 In the normal case, a ModelAndView instance consists of a view name and a model Map, containing bean names and corresponding objects (like a command or form, reference data, etc)。 View name resolution is highly configurable, either via bean names, via a properties file, or via your own ViewResolver implementation。 The abstract model Map allows for complete abstraction of the view technology, without any hassle: Be it JSP, Velocity, or anything else - every renderer can be integrated directly。 The model Map simply gets transformed into an appropriate format, like JSP request attributes or a Velocity template model。 (责任编辑：qin)