2。2。2 Characteristics of effective classroom questions

In the view of Edmondson (1984), questions can be directed to an inpidual, the whole class or students of different levels。 Hence, while designing questions, teachers are supposed to take the learning levels and needs of different students into consideration so that the questions could get different students involved。 Glatthorn (1993) also put forward similar ideas。 He holds that teacher should improve the question difficulty to enable students to achieve the expected goals while expanding the thinking depth。

Gall (1970) regards the explicit question expression of teachers as a very important element for the effectiveness of questioning。 The question expression of teachers will influence the understanding of students to teachers' questions and the quality of students' answers。 

Morgan and Saxton (1991:78-79) summarize the common characteristics as follows。 First, an effective question should include demonstration of a genuine curiosity。 Second, it must has an inner logic connected in some way with teachers' focus and students' experiences。 Third, the words in an effective question are supposed to be organized in such a way that the thinking is clarified both for students and teachers。 In addition, it would be advocated if the question can challenges existing thinking and encourages reflection。

In conclusion, the valid questions must be designed attentively by teachers。 Besides checking the understanding of students, the questions should make students gain the confidence and pleasure in language learning。 More importantly, students are enabled to promote their overall language competence。

2。2。3 Functions of effective questioning

Lu (2005) once wrote the article about the effectiveness of class questioning and the evaluation methods and he thinks that effective questioning can promote students’ development of cognition, that questioning can control teaching process and get feedback, and that questioning can promote students’ emotional and social development。 Fang (2014) talks about four points in her article on questioning as follows: causing motivation, start thinking, checking the teachers’ teaching effects and sudden comprehending。 来,自,优.尔:论;文*网www.youerw.com +QQ752018766-

Zhang and Huang (2001) think that questioning has the following functions: checking and evaluating students’ reading comprehension; causing students’ curiosity and interest; helping students organize and analyze the information provided by the reading material and helping them understand it correctly and clearly; helping students sum up, review and strengthen what they have learned; urging the students to improve comprehension qualities at different cognition layers, making the class atmosphere vivid to offer opportunities for teachers and students to dialog and communicate mutually; making the purpose of reading more clear。 

All in all, questioning is an important part for teachers-students and students-students to communicate。 Not only can it arouse students attention and interest but also enlighten their minds。 Therefore, it should be placed at the center of effective teaching。 

上一篇:小组合作学习在小学英语课堂中的实施
下一篇:谭恩美小说《接骨师之女》中的男性人物分析

大学英语教材分析及理论框架应用

浙江省英语师范生课堂指示语的研究

汉英语言中狗习语文化对比分析

中美英语口语类慕课多模态对比分析

影响初中英语课堂任务设计的因素分析

初中英语写作中的错误分析

猜测游戏在初中英语教学中的应用研究

微探联通主义观照下慕課...

2023开放三胎政策,中國三...

大学生网络成瘾与品行问题倾向的关系研究

视觉辨识技术的视频监控...

论《人间喜剧》的“金钱”主题

FeTiMn尖晶石协同控制燃煤...

基于DirectX技术的3D游戏Demo设计与实现

公立医院财务管理及财务...

功率因数校正技术研究现状和发展趋势

企业中女性管理者职业发展的障碍及对策