毕业论文

打赏
当前位置: 毕业论文 > 外文文献翻译 >

企业的社会责任英文文献和中文翻译

时间:2018-04-13 15:32来源:毕业论文
Eor the past several decades, the debate over the proper relationship between r business and society has focused on the topic of corporate social responsi- bility (CSR) (Klonoski 1991). In the modern era, the stage was set for this debate by

Eor  the past  several  decades,  the debate  over  the proper  relationship  between r  business and  society has focused on the topic of corporate  social responsi- bility  (CSR)  (Klonoski  1991).  In  the modern  era,  the  stage was  set  for  this debate by Keith Davis, who posed two intriguing  questions  in the 1960s: "What  does the businessperson  owe  society?" (Davis  1967) and "Can  business afford  to ignore  its social responsibilities?"  (Davis 1960).  Although  many  have  attempted to define CSR  over  the  years,  the  concept  has  remained  vague  and  ambiguous  to some (Makower  1994: 12). Definitions of CSR  fall into  two general  schools of thought,  those that argue  that business is  obligated only to maximize profits within  the  boundaries  of the  law and  minimal  ethical  constraints  (Friedman  1970; Levitt 1958), and  those that  have suggested a broader  range  of obligations  to- ward  society (Andrews  1973;  Carroll  1979;  Davis and  Blomstrom  1975;  Epstein 1987; McGuire  1963). 21091
An important  attempt  to bridge  the gap  between  economics and  other  expec-
tations was offered by Archie Carroll  (1979). His efforts culminated  in  the
following proposed  definition  of corporate  social responsibility:
The  social  responsibility  of business  encompasses  the  economic,  legal,  ethi-
cal, and discretionary  expectations  that  society has of organizations  at a
given point  in time. (1979: 500, emphasis  added)
As a helpful way of graphically  depicting  the components  of his CSR  defini-
tion  and  expounding  upon  them,  he  later  incorporated  his  four-part  categorization
into a "Pyramid  of Corporate  Social Responsibility"  (1991;  1993). Carroll's
Pyramid  of CSR  is presented  in Figure 1.
Carroll's  four  categories  or domains  of CSR  have been utilized  by numerous
theorists  (Wartick  and Cochran  1985; Wood 1991; Swanson 1995, 1999) and
empirical  researchers  (Aupperle  1984;  Aupperle,  Carroll,  and  Hatfield  1985;  Bur-
ton and Hegarty  1999; Clarkson  1995;  Ibrahim  and  Angelidis 1993, 1994, 1995;
Mallott  1993;  O'Neill, Saunders,  and  McCarthy  1989;  Pinkston  and  Carroll  1996;
Smith, Wokutch,  Harrington,  and  Dennis  2001; Spencer  and  Butler  1987;  Strong
and Meyer 1992). Several  business and society and business ethics texts have
incorporated  Carroll's  CSR  domains  (Boatright  1993;  Buchholz  1995;  Weiss  1994)
or have depicted  the CSR Pyramid  (Carroll  and  Buchholtz  2000, 2003; Jackson,
Miller, and Miller 1997; Sexty 1995; Trevino  and Nelson 1995). According  to
Wood  and  Jones  (1996:  45), Carroll's  four  domains  have "enjoyed  wide popular-
ity among  SIM  (Social Issues  in Management)  scholars."  Such  use suggests  that
Carroll's  CSR domains  and pyramid  framework  remain  a leading paradigm  of 企业的社会责任英文文献和中文翻译:http://www.youerw.com/fanyi/lunwen_13151.html
------分隔线----------------------------
推荐内容