菜单
  


    SCIENTIFIC FUNDAMENTALS

    Model of Opinion Mining

    In general, opinions can be expressed on anything, e.g., a product, a service, a topic, an inpidual, an organization, or an event. The general term object is used to denote the entity that has been commented on. An object has a set of components (or parts) and a set of attributes. Each component may also have its sub-components and its set of attributes, and so on. Thus, the object can be hierarchically decomposed based on the part-of relationship.

    Definition (object): An object O is an entity which can be a product, topic, person, event, or organization. It is associated with a pair, O: (T, A), where T is a hierarchy or taxonomy of components (or parts) and sub-components of O, and A is a set of attributes of O. Each component has its own set of sub-components and attributes.

    In this hierarchy or tree, the root is the object itself. Each non-root node is a component or sub-component of the object. Each link is a part-of relationship. Each node is associated with a set of attributes. An opinion can be expressed on any node and any attribute of the node.

    However, for an ordinary user, it is probably too complex to use a hierarchical representation. To simplify it, the tree is flattened. The word “features” is used to represent both components and attributes. Using features for objects (especially products) is quite common in practice. Note that in this definition the object itself is also a feature, which is the root of the tree.

    Let an evaluative document be d, which can be a product review, a forum post or a blog that evaluates a particular object O. In the most general case, d consists of a sequence of sentences d = 〈s1, s2, …, sm〉.
    Definition (opinion passage on a feature): The opinion passage on a feature f of the object O evaluated in d is a group of consecutive sentences in d that expresses a positive or negative opinion on f. This means that it is possible that a sequence of sentences (at least one) together expresses an opinion on an object or a feature of the object. It is also possible that a single sentence expresses opinions on more than one feature, e.g., “The picture quality of this camera is good, but the battery life is short”.
    Definition (opinion holder): The holder of a particular opinion is a person or an organization that holds the opinion. In the case of product reviews, forum postings and blogs, opinion holders are usually the authors of the posts. Opinion holders are important in news articles because they often explicitly state the person or organization that holds a particular opinion [9]. For example, the opinion holder in the sentence “John expressed his disagreement on the treaty” is “John”.

    Digital_camera_1:
    CAMERA:
    Positive: 125    <inpidual review sentences>
    Negative: 7     <inpidual review sentences>
    Feature: picture quality
    Positive: 123    <inpidual review sentences>
    Negative: 6     <inpidual review sentences>
    Feature: size
    Positive: 82     <inpidual review sentences>
    Negative: 10    <inpidual review sentences>

    Fig. 1. An example of a feature-based summary of opinions
    Definition (semantic orientation of an opinion): The semantic orientation of an opinion on a feature f states whether the opinion is positive, negative or neutral. Putting things together, a model for an object and a set of opinions on the features of the object can be defined, which is called the feature-based opinion mining model.

    Model of Feature-Based Opinion Mining: An object O is represented with a finite set of features, F ={f1, f2, …, fn}, which includes the object itself. Each feature fi ∈ F can be expressed with a finite set of words or phrases Wi, which are synonyms. That is, there is a set of corresponding synonym sets W = {W1, W2, …, Wn} for the n features. In an evaluative document d which evaluates object O, an opinion holder j comments on a subset of the features Sj ⊆ F. For each feature fk ∈ Sj that opinion holder j comments on, he/she chooses a word or phrase from Wk to describe the feature, and then expresses a positive, negative or neutral opinion on fk. The opinion mining task is to discover all these hidden pieces of information from a given evaluative document d.
  1. 上一篇:路由信息协议Rip英文文献和中文翻译
  2. 下一篇:Java与网络英文文献和中文翻译
  1. 利用BIM来分析施工安全风...

  2. 柴油机缸内润滑油消耗分...

  3. 干涉配合轴的应力分析英文文献和中文翻译

  4. 加压蛋壳分析英文文献和中文翻译

  5. 基卡气体管道PLEM结构的原...

  6. 极端波浪载荷实验船模的...

  7. 船舶设计中的消防安全性...

  8. 巴金《激流三部曲》高觉新的悲剧命运

  9. 高警觉工作人群的元情绪...

  10. 上市公司股权结构对经营绩效的影响研究

  11. C++最短路径算法研究和程序设计

  12. g-C3N4光催化剂的制备和光催化性能研究

  13. 现代简约美式风格在室内家装中的运用

  14. 江苏省某高中学生体质现状的调查研究

  15. 浅析中国古代宗法制度

  16. NFC协议物理层的软件实现+文献综述

  17. 中国传统元素在游戏角色...

  

About

优尔论文网手机版...

主页:http://www.youerw.com

关闭返回