论我国交通肇事逃逸行为及刑法规制
毕业论文关键词：交通肇事 逃逸行为 当前立法 争议 合理规制
Discussion of taffic acident ecaping bhavior and ciminal rgulation
Abstract: Road traffic safety issues have become increasingly prominent, more and more attention has been seriously, Traffic Accident Escaping Behavior potential threat, damage to normal road traffic order, is extremely detrimental to social stability. "People's Republic of China Criminal Law (revised in 1997" (hereinafter referred to as the "Criminal Law"), Article 133 ["Criminal Law" Article 133 [traffic crime violates traffic regulations, and therefore a major accident , causing serious injury, death or serious losses to public and private property, and three years imprisonment or criminal detention; Transport fled after the accident or other special circumstances of the poor, not more than seven years in prison; caused by escape deaths of over seven years], the "escape and cause people death" to establish as a traffic crime of sentencing; in 2000, China's Supreme People's Court issued a "Supreme People's Court to hear the traffic Casualties Several criminal cases of legal interpretation "(hereinafter referred to as the" interpretation ") [" interpretation "of the second paragraph of Article traffic accident caused by more than one person seriously injured, negative incidents were the primary responsibility, and have one of the following circumstances, in order to Traffic accident, convicted and punished.
Keywords: Traffic Accident Escaping Behavior Problems Criminal Regulation
一、 交通肇事逃逸行为概述
（一） 交通肇事逃逸行为含义及分析
交通肇事逃逸是指在发生交通事故之后，行为人为逃避责任，不向公安机关报案，也不采取措施抢救伤者和公私财产而逃离交通事故现场，或者发生事故后弃车逃逸,对于处罚的力度要根据行为人的情节严重程度而制裁。
首先逃逸行为的表象行为是积极的，交通肇事逃逸行为实质上是逃避应当履行的义务，是一种典型的不作为行为。由于这种不作为，导致交通事故后缺失抢救义务和认定法律责任困难的结果；其次在主观恶性上，交通肇事后的逃逸行为远大于交通肇事行为，使受害人的合法权益处于更加危险的状态；再次交通肇事逃逸行为的目的是逃避救助义务和逃避肇事责任认定。
(二）交通肇事逃逸行为的构成要件
1.交通肇事逃逸行为的主体要件，是指法律上的一般的主体，即交通肇事逃逸行为的主体可能是任何人。
2.交通肇事逃逸行为的客体要件，即侵犯的对象是我国法律保护的公民的生命权、健康权、财产权以及国家正常的司法追诉活动。
3.在主观方面上，交通肇事逃逸行为是一种积极的心理活动，具有直接的故意。主观上，交通肇事逃逸行为人存在两个根本动机：逃避事故后抢救义务和逃避之后的责任追究。逃避抢救义务的动机指的是行为消极，意图不予保护现场、不对当事人进行抢救、没有迅速报案等。意图混淆交通事故之后的责任认定和避免责任追究是逃避责任追究的动机。交通肇事逃逸行为是上述两种动机的重合，无论是具备两个动机其中的哪一个，都认定是具备了交通肇事逃逸行为的主观方面。比如，钱某在肇事之后，虽然没有进行抢救但是留下了真实姓名和联系方式的情形，由于逃避抢救义务，虽然只是逃避了两个动机之中的一个，也认定构成了交通肇事逃逸行为的主观方面。
上一篇：从立法层面谈社区矫正制度的完善
下一篇：土地征收中公共利益的研究