摘要：近几年来，“误拆”事件频频发生，相关报道也层出不穷，事实上，所谓的“误拆”大多数都是拆迁方故意为之，只是想规避强拆的责任和刑罚，从而导致拆迁方把“误拆”当成强拆的借口。“误拆”行为不容忽视，从构成故意毁坏财物罪的构成要件来分析，故意“误拆”所造成的损失在达到我国法律明确规定的定量标准，就可能构成故意毁坏财物罪。本文主要以南京邮局被拆案为切入点进行研究探讨。找出故意“误拆”事件屡禁不止的根本原因。并认为应该修改信访属地管辖原则、建立有效的监督体系和完善相关法律等对策，减少甚至杜绝故意“误拆”事件的发生。56190

毕业论文关键词：“误拆”，故意， 故意毁坏财物罪 ，监督体制改革

Abstract : In recent years, "mistakenly removed" the frequent occurrence of the relevant reports are endless, in fact, the so-called "mistaken demolition" demolition party intentionally mostly just want to evade responsibility and punishment demolitions, resulting in the demolition party "mistakenly removed" as a pretext for demolitions. "Mistakenly removed 'behavior can not be ignored, from the constituent elements constitute the crime of intentional destruction of property analysis, intentionally" mistakenly removed "losses caused by the country in achieving quantitative criteria specified by law, may constitute the crime of intentional destruction of property. In this paper, in order to split the post office in Nanjing as a starting point to explore case studies. Locate intentionally "mistakenly removed" the root cause of repeated events. And that the petition should be modified principle of territorial jurisdiction, to establish an effective system of supervision and improve relevant laws and other measures to reduce or even eliminate the occurrence of intentionally "mistakenly removed" event.

Key words :"mistakenly removed" ,intentionally, intentional destruction of property, supervision reform

目录

1引言 4

2关于“误拆”真实性的探析 4

2.1 南京邮局被拆案 4

2.2案情分析——故意“误拆” 4

3故意“误拆”的定性分析 5

3.1故意毁坏财物罪的概念 5

3.2故意毁坏财物罪的构成要件 6

4故意“误拆”行为的原因及影响分析 7

4.1故意“误拆”产生的原因 7

4.2故意“误拆”现象的影响分析 9

5解决故意“误拆”问题的对策 9

5.1修改信访属地管辖的原则 10

5.2建立有效的针对司法机关的监督体系 10

5.3扩大本罪的主题范围 11

5.4明确规定强拆的范围 11

5.5切实保障民众知情权 12

结  论 13

参考文献 14

致  谢 15

1引言

随着中国经济的快速发展，各地对土地的需求程度越发的加大，政府和人民群众开始了“土地争夺战”。再加上现今房价的上涨又使得许多人想凭借拆迁补偿而一夜暴富。这种情况下，政府要与拆迁户达成一致意见是很难办到的。钉子户漫天要价，政府根本满足不了，即使能满足，其他人也一样要享受相应的待遇。而“误拆”就成了对付“钉子户”的绝佳办法，这一借口，又能很好的规避掉法律责任，因此，“误拆”事件屡禁不止，愈演愈烈。