The first is about the leisure and tense of the novel and the soothing of the film。 The style of the original novel is a mix of leisure and tension。 In the film, under the surface of the charming, leisure, soothing atmosphere hides the torrent of rapids-complex and varied drama conflicts between characters and characters and between characters and themselves。 This is also one aspect which I will talk about in my essay and add my thought to this argument。
The second is about the imagination of the novel and the imagery of the film。 The novel is based on text symbols as the carrier of imaginative narrative art。 Readers firstly identify the text symbols as concept and category, forming a hazy, inpidual, illusory perception in the mind。 Imagination inevitably runs through the reading of the novel。 It is the process of the meaning of the novel that determines the ambiguity and implication of the language of the novel。 The film is based on the image and sound as the carrier of the direct perception of multimedia art。 It will concrete imagination, with the audience's imagination solidified in the picture and sound。 It provides intuitive video, realistic reproduction of static things, and even can reveal things that can not be seen in the normal conditions。
《看得见风景的房间》从文字到影像(3):http://www.youerw.com/yingyu/lunwen_197711.html