[摘要]随着新民事诉讼法的颁布,检察机关的民事职能也发生了相应的改变,在旧民事诉讼法中,人民检察院只有权对民事审判活动进行法律监督。而在2012年的新民诉中这一规定发生了改变,即人民检察院有权对民事诉讼实行法律监督。监督的范围已经扩大到整个民事诉讼活动的全过程,由原来的事后监督变成了全面监督。除此以外,新民事诉讼法还相应的增加了检察建议制度。本文将从新民诉的角度出发,重新定位检察机关的职权职责,整合新增加的检察机关的职能范围,并对其作相应的法理分析。本文也将介绍一下两大法系中富有代表性的国家的有关检察机关的职能制度,并对其做相应的制度性解读,并且,本文还会把国外有关检察机关的制度与国内做对应比较,期望能指出国内检察制度的缺陷。更重要的是,将从这些缺陷里完善我国民事诉讼中检察机关的职能。通过不断的研究以达到制度完善的效果。26484
[毕业论文关键词] 检察机关 民事诉讼 法律监督 制度完善
The Duty and Improvement of Procurator In Civil Procedure Law
[Abstract]With the ordination of new civil procedure law , the power of procurator also have changed .among the previous civil procedure law, the people’ procurator just only have the power to supervise the judicial procedure .However, this have changed in the modification of the civil procedure law. Now, the people’ procurator have the power to supervise the whole civil procedure .From the previous judicial procedure to the whole civil procedure and from the previous control to the whole procedure control .In addition, the new civil procedure law also add the system of the advice of procurator. This passage will restart to fix on the role of the procurator in the new civil procedure law. We will classify the new letter of civil procedure law about the the power of the procedure and we will also analyze the theory of the letter of the law . What’s more, the writer will make a introduction about the institution of the civil law system and the common law system on the power of the procedure . We will also analyze the the theory of the foreign law. In addition, a comparison will be made out between the foreign law and the home law. At last , we will find the weakness of home law and make the progress in the part of the power of procurator .By no means should we try our best to improve the institution of our country.
[Key words]: the procurator the civil procedure the supervise of civil procedure law the improvement of institution
目录 .1
摘要.2
一、我国民事诉讼中检察监督原则及其制度.2
(一)检察监督原则的制度表现.3
(二)检察监督原则中新增具体内容的制度分析.3
(三)全面监督中检察机关与其他诉讼主体的关系.6
二、我国民事诉讼中检察监督制度的不足.8
(一)大陆法系检察机关的职能8
(二)英美法系检察机关的职能.9
(三)从两大法系中的检察机关的角色看我国检察监督制度的不足.9
三、我国民事诉讼中检察机关职能的完善10
(一)参与到民事诉讼中的身份的完善10
(二)检察建议制度的完善10
(三)执行监督的完善11
(四)公益诉讼制度的完善12
参考文献.14
Abstract.15
民事诉讼中的检察机关的职能及其完善
一、我国民事诉讼中的检察监督原则及其制度
检察监督原则一直是我国民事诉讼法的一项基本原则。在我国,在《民事诉讼法》中确立法律监督原则是非常有必要的。因为它使得民事诉讼程序在阳光下健康运行,因此对于检察机关的民事检察监督职能的准确定位必将对我国法制具有重要意义。我国在2012之前,《民事诉讼法》中规定“检察机关有权对民事审判活动实行法律监督。”而从整个《民事诉讼法》的结构来看,其包括总则、一审普通程序、二审程序、审判监督程序、特别程序、执行程序以及涉外民事诉讼中的一般程序。民事审判活动只是程序之一。若检察监督权仅仅存在于审判程序中,未免显得过于狭隘,这样使得很多程序的监督,处于被架空状态,很不利于民事诉讼程序公正健康的运行。