商业秘密刑事保护制度研究
关键词 商业秘密 刑事保护 侵犯商业秘密罪
毕业论文外文摘要
Title The study on the system of criminal protection of trade secrets
Abstract
When the trade secret has been protected by Against Competition with Inappropriate Means and civil law has become normalcy, the intervention of the criminal law aiming at trade secret still seems not emboldened enough, while domestic criminal protection of the trade secret is more than a blank. Therefore, how to implement the protection of the trade secret in a better way, and how to better utlize measures-criminal measures to effectively protect trade secrets have become unusually urgent tasks. Currently, there is only one provision aiming at the stipulate of business secret crime in China. Moreover, since the crime of infringing commercial secrets has been legislate, there comes a lot of problems in juridical practice because of the over simplicity of law. Criminal law protections system of the trade secrets which includes the assumption of the crimes, sentencing guidelines, the perfection of the lawsuit procedures awaits to improve. This article is going to use the business secret criminal protection theory of Britain, America, Russian and Japan as a reference, so as to put forward the constructive comments on the improvement of trade secret protection regime in mainland China.
Keywords trade secrets criminal protection crime of breaching business secrets
目 次
1 引言 1
2 商业秘密刑事保护概述 3
2.1 商业秘密刑事保护的内涵 3
2.2 商业秘密刑事保护的现状 4
2.3 商业秘密刑事保护的必要性 4
3 域外商业秘密刑事保护的趋势 7
3.1 美国商业秘密刑事保护的制度变化 7
3.2 俄罗斯商业秘密刑事保护的制度变化 8
3.3 日本和德国商业秘密刑事保护的制度经验 8
4 我国商业秘密刑事保护制度现状及存在的问题 9
4.1 我国商业秘密刑事保护的现状 9
4.2 我国商业秘密刑事保护存在的问题 9
5 我国商业秘密刑事保护制度的完善建议 12
5.1 明确构成侵犯商业秘密罪的主客观要件 12
5.2 调整侵犯商业秘密罪的刑罚配置重点 12
5.3 制定合理的有关“重大损失”的认定模式 13
5.4 充分保障商业秘密权利人的刑事诉讼权利 13
5.5 完善商业秘密刑事案件中的附带民事诉讼制度 13
结论 14
致谢 15
参考文献16
1 引言
伴随着经济全球化以及知识经济的快速发展，知识产权领域正逐渐成为企业间交锋的主战场。然而尽管专利制度曾以能够提供公开的排他性垄断使用而被认为是保护技术信息，激励创新并促进信息公开与分享的较优制度，但近年来，专利制度已经面临着重重危机，例如“专利权利要求书”的复杂使得法庭确认专利权利要求十分困难，对全面覆盖原则如何适用的判定有时也难达成统一的意见；专利丛林问题的产生阻碍了下游专利权人开发新技术，不利于技术的革新；滥用诉权的专利流氓行为的日趋普遍，使得世界范围内硬件及软件公司因不合理的专利诉讼而造成了高达292亿美元的直接成本。
下一篇：当代大学生道德失范行为分析