[摘要]我国关于保险代位求偿权的行使缺乏完善的法律支撑,主要问题在于保险代位求偿权适用范围不合理,保险代位求偿权行使的名义和时效缺乏配套制度的支持以及未明确规定不同时点妨害保险代位求偿权的法律效果及其规制措施。本文认为应适当扩展保险代位求偿权的适用范围,使其在人身保险中得以适用。本文对现行立法中关于保险代位求偿权行使时效的规定提出质疑,认为保险代位求偿权与损害赔偿请求权应享有相同的诉讼时效,并以共同原告制度作为配套制度解决第三人疲于应诉的问题。针对被保险人妨害保险代位求偿权行使的情形,本文提出“区分说”的观点,根据不同的时间点对妨害的法律效果及其规制措施做出区分性的规定。
[毕业论文关键词]损失补偿保险 共同原告制度 区分说
On Insurance Subrogation Right
[Abstract] The execution of our country’s insurance subrogation right is short of perfect legal support. The main problems are unreasonable scope of application of insurance subrogation right and lack of relevant system for name and limitation of insurance subrogation right. In addition, the legal effect and treatment measure for detriment of insurance subrogation right is ambiguous. The article suggests to extend the scope of application of insurance subrogation right to apply subrogation litigation to personal insurance and amend the rules to make sure that the insurer and the insured have the same limitation of execution of the right. The insurer and the insured could use co-plaintiff system to solve the problem of that insurer and the insured may repeatedly sued the third person. The article puts forward view of "distinguish". According to different time of the insurance contract, we make different legal effect and treatment measure for the detriment of the subrogation.
[Key words] Indemnity Insurance Co-plaintiff System View of "Distinguish"
目录
中文摘要1
一、保险代位求偿权含义1
二、保险代位求偿权立法现状及问题1
(一)保险代位求偿权适用的范围1
(二)保险代位求偿权行使的名义与时效2
(三)妨害保险代位求偿权的法律后果及其规制2
三、保险代位求偿权立法的改进2
(一)合理确定保险代位求偿权的适用范围2
1各国(地区)立法经验3
2立法改进建议3
(二)保险代位求偿权行使的名义与时效4
1完善保险代位求偿权行使名义的相关规定5
(1)各国立法经验5
(2)立法改进建议5
2修改保险代位求偿权行使时效的规定6
(三)明确妨害保险代位求偿权的法律效果并完善其规制措施8
1保险合同订立前——以“告知义务”为补充8
2保险合同订立后,保险事故发生前——以“危险增加之通知义务”
为补充 9
3保险事故发生后,保险金给付前——从“免除给付义务”向“依妨
害之程度减轻给付责任”转变10
4保险金给付后——“弃权无效”与“协助代位义务”的结合10
结语10
注释11
浅析保险代位求偿权