摘 要:长期以来,作为商品住宅小区配套设施的小区地下车库,其权利归属在理论和实践中均是争议的焦点。自2007年《物权法》颁布以来,虽对小区地下车库权属提供了一定的法律依据,但法条规定过于宏观教条化和原则化,缺乏现实操作的实用性,难以解决车库权属的复杂现状。本文从小区车库的类型入手,重点研究地下车库的权利归属,以物权法中建筑物区分所有权中,专有所有权和共有所有权为理论依据,来分析业主所有说、开发商所有说、约定归属说的利弊,从而提出较为赞同的约定归属说观点,来分析小区车库权属。根据我国《物权法》七十四条所采用的约定归属说的立法缺陷,提出针对性的建议。39332 毕业论文关键词:小区地下车库;物权法;专有所有权;业主;权利归属
Research on Ownership of Underground Garage
Abstract:For a long time, as community underground garage of commodity residential facilities, the right ownership was the focus of controversy in both theory and practice.Since "property law" promulgated in 2007, although the village garages ownership provides a legal basis, but is too general folk law regulations and principles, the lack of real operation is practical, is difficult to solve the garage the ownership of the complicated situation.In this paper, from the type of community garage, focuses on the rights of the underground garage, with the property law in the building differentiation ownership, the exclusive ownership and joint ownership as the theoretical basis, to analyze the owner all say, developers said, agreed the pros and cons of attribution said, raising more agree with the provisions of the attribution said point of view, to analyze the community garage the ownership.According to China's "property law" article seventy-four conventions adopted by the ownership legislation defects, put forward: to implement the provisions of the "first of all meet the requirements of the owner", the law should be clear when there is no prescribed and unknown force intervention by the administrative department of ownership, enhance pertinence suggestion.
Keywords:undergroundparking;Garage;PropertyLaw;Buildingdiscrimination property rights;Developers;Ownership
目 录