摘要近年来,在高等教育治理中,为改善高校绩效状况,引入了高校委异校交流的制度。本文利用我国“985工程”大学2001-2014年间历任委个人特征面板数据与大学排名的数据,实证检验了高校委异校交流制度对于学校排名的影响。结果表明:高校委异校任职有利于提升高校的排名成绩——第一,外校调入的高校委可以充分利用其在学校外部获得的经验为该校争取更多的稀缺资源,营造更加和谐的社会发展环境。第二,异校升职模式中避嫌机制的存在可以有效打破高校机构中“人情关系”,使得业绩导向在衡量高校发展的过程中享有更高地位并发挥重要的作用;第三,异校任职模式有利于引进先进办学经验,推动高校改革。因此,我们应继续鼓励和完善这一制度,提升高校治理水平,推动我国高等教育事业的蓬勃发展。86434
Can the exchanging in a new spot of party committee secretary promote the university ranking?
Abstract Nowadays, the trans-university administration of college party Committee secretary has been adopted as a common practice to improve the performance management in the administration of colleges and universities。 With the analysis of the correlation between the qualifications of college party committee secretaries and the universities’ ranks in 985 project key universities during2001-2014, this paper tries to figure out the possible effects of party secretary’s trans-university administration on the universities rankings。 The final result verifies the positive effects as following: first, the party committee secretary from other university can have a better external resources integration to achieve a more harmonious and prosperous development for school; secondly, the trans-university administration can make a best use of performance-oriented evaluation by means of avoiding the possible negative influence of the abnormal interpersonal relationship in performance management; thirdly, the trans-university administration can promote the higher education reforms and innovations through the introduction and communication of advanced experience between universities。 In the end, this paper points out that the practice of college party committee secretaries’ trans-university administration should be encouraged and carried forward further to achieve a comprehensive and vigorousness development of Chinese higher education。
Keywords: secretary of college party committee;trans-university administration; performance management;promotion mode
目 录
0 引言 1
1文献综述 3
2理论假说 6
3 数据描述 7
3。1 数据选取与处理方式 8
3。1。1 样本高校数据的选取 8
3。1。2高校委数据 8
3。1。3大学排名数据的选取 9
3。2 高校委个人特征的描述性统计 10
3。2。1基本特征 10
3。2。2 教育背景 10
3。2。3 升职渠道与方式 10
3。2。4 职业背景 11
3。3 小结 11
3。4启示 12
4实证分析 13
4。1 模型设定