摘 要:无权处分制度是十分复杂的,涉及面也很广,一直有“法学上的精灵”之称。关于此制度,世界各国学者的观点不一,我国学者对我国《合同法》第51条关于此制度的规定也持三种观点,即“效力待定说”、“无效说”和“有效说”。通过对我国学者对于无权处分效力的几种看法进行了简单的剖析,认为“有效说”更符合经济发展的需求,有利于对当事人权益的保护,有利于我国立法体系的协调,并且,认定无权处分效力有效更符合国际潮流。25006 毕业论文关键词:无权处分;法律效力;善意取得
Study on the validity of unauthorized disposition
Abstract:Unauthorized Disposition system is very complex, involving a very wide, there have been "Wizard of Law on" said. Issued up to now, scholars view right disposition effect for the "Contract Law" Article 51 of the mixed, mainly pided from China's "Contract Law", "effect pending", "the invalid say" and "effective to say" these three theories. Based on the effectiveness of our scholars for not entitled to dispose of several views of a simple analysis, that "effectively saying" more in line with the needs of economic development is conducive to the protection of rights and interests of the parties, facilitate the coordination of our legislative system, and, identify unauthorized disposition effect is more effective in line with international trends.
Keywords:unauthorized disposition;the legal effect;acquired in good faith
目 录