摘    要 有限责任公司因其人合性特征导致各股东间信任基础和共同利益关系影响着有限责任公司的正常运行和营利活动。这也意味着当股东之间的信任基石出现裂痕，共同利益关系遭破坏，占据强势地位的控股股东或者实际控制人极有可能为维持或增加自己的利益而排挤参与投资的小股东权益，这一行为进而会对公司的正常运转造成或多或少的影响。85279

现行有效的《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称《公司法》）设置公司司法解散制度，赋予部分股东在特定条件下提起司法解散诉权，可以为陷入公司僵局泥淖的股东提供一条退出公司的途径。有限责任公司中受压制股东合法权益被侵害的情况亦存在，为保护小股东的自由意志的表达和合法利益的保护，也为维护公司的长期健康盈利运作，有必要考虑完善当前我国公司法对于小股东利益的保护机制，本文则探究赋予受到压制的中小股东提起公司司法解散之诉权的可行性。

毕业论文关键词：有限责任公司； 司法解散制度； 股东压制； 股东权益救济；

Due to the personal relationships in the limited liability corporation, the basic trust and common interests among shareholders will definitely influence the normal management and earnings of the limited liability corporation。 And this means when the foot-stone of trust cracks or the relationship of common interests breaks, the mighty controlling stockholders or the actual controllers probably aggrieve the benefits of minority stockholders to maintain or increase their interests, which will more or less influence the normal management of companies。

Company Law of the PRC ( hereinafter called Company Law ) establishes judicial dissolution of the company to provide some stockholders with the rights of appealing to judicial dissolution in the particular situations, which offers a way for those stockholders in trouble to withdraw company。 There exists the situation in reality that the legal rights of suppressed shareholders is aggrieved in limited liability corporation。 Therefore, to protect the consciousness of freedom and the legal rights of minority stockholders, and to maintain the profit operation of company in the long term, it’s necessary to improve the protection system in Company Law for the interests of minority stockholders。 This thesis will explore the possibility of suppressed minority stockholders appealing to company judicial dissolution。 

Keyword: limited liability corporation； judicial dissolution； 

shareholder oppression: reliefs for aggrieved shareholders’rights and interest

目    录

引言···03

一、股东压制基础理论···04

（一）股东压制的内涵···04

（二）股东压制的成因···05

1。 “经济人”的本质05

2。 股份多数决的滥用06

3。 有限责任公司所有权和源Q于W优H尔J论K文M网WwW.youeRw.com 原文+QQ75201.,8766 经营权的不完全分离·06

二、司法解散制度在股东压制情形中适用的中美实践考察07

（一）美国07

1。 股东压制行为的认定···08

2。 基于股东压制的司法解散的适用··08

（二）中国09

1。立法现状09

2。司法案例09

三、赋予受压制股东司法解散诉权的可能性探究10

（一）事前预防救济——公司章程··10

（二）事后弥补救济——异议股东回购请求权·11

结语···12

参考文献·13 

致谢···14