On The Accomplice of Negative Crime
Abstract: Negative act , opposite to act of commission, is an important content of the criminal law act theory . It is the meaning that the feason has the specific obligation for something and has the ability and possibility to fulfill the obligation,but he failed to fulfill an obligation.As the representatives for the Continental Law System, Germany and Japan has a long history for the research of it. Based on the German research, Japan has depth discussion on the aspects and generated a lot of new viewpoint. There are some controversial issues in the Continental Law System: the difference between negative principal offender and negative accomplice; The definition of psychological causal relationship; The necessity of protect the status of the parties and so on. Therefore, The basic theory of negative accomplice mainly talk about the difference generality between principal offender and accomplice in accomplice theory and its punishment, through these we advance to specific analysis and discussion. Keywords: Not take;narrow accomplice;as instigator;omission auxilary
目 录
摘要 1
Abstract 1
一、不作为共犯的概述 2
(一) 不作为的认定 2
(二) 共犯的构成 5
(三) 不作为共犯的厘定 6
二、不作为共犯的存否论 6
(一) 不作为的教唆犯的存否 6
(二) 不作为的帮助犯的存否 8
(三) 不作为的帮助犯的概念及特征 10
三、不作为共犯的处罚的界定 10
参考文献 13
致 谢 14,3626
前言某日黄昏,17岁女生甲在郊外打上王某的出租车,当时在王某的车上已经坐上其表弟乙,在车开往市里的过程中,乙见甲美色便强奸了她。在此过程中,王某既没有停车,也没有阻止,只是劝说了几句。随后,“冷漠的哥”王某以涉嫌强奸罪被检察机关起诉,并被判刑2年。这个案子发生后,引起了社会各界对“见危不救”现象的再度关注。在他人犯罪,负有阻止犯罪发生或危害结果出现的义务,能够实施而不予实施的作为义务,致使危害结果发生的,是不作为的帮助犯,例如本案中的王某。不作为犯与共犯一直是刑法研究的重点领域,但对于二者的交叉重合的地方,即不作为的共犯,国内理论界研究已经起步,但与德日相比,仍旧有些落后和不完善的地方。早在德国20世纪50年代,就有司法判例对不作为的帮助犯加以肯定。在日本的昭和时期,也有了一些审判案例,且不断增加。之后,“冷漠的哥”的案例提醒我们实践过程的不作为形式的帮助犯亦可能出现在未来的社会中,由典型的案例转变为普通的案例,而问题探讨的不足一定会秉公处理此类案件的掣肘,因此笔者选择了研究不作为共犯这一题目。