摘要：2010年十二月份，金砖四国经过共同决策后，同意南非加入，共同组成金砖五国。而今，经济全球化程度不断深化，“金砖国家”是全球新兴经济体的主要代表，也是发展中国家的引导者，逐渐受到了全球各国的关注。在金砖国家获得较好的发展之后，其国际地位与日俱增，与此同时，其服务贸易差异依旧存在。在金砖国家的经济获得快速发展、对外贸易得到较好地拓展之后，各国的贸易竞争格局产生了一些改变。以金砖国家服务贸易的现实发展情况为依据，本文选取了服务贸易总量、TC指数等一些指标，站在不同的视角分析了其国际竞争实力，最终的结果表明，印度是金砖五国中竞争力最为强大的，中国名列中间，南非的潜藏能力十分强劲，其余两个国家的竞争力则进步极为缓慢。可见中国服务贸易亟待提升，进一步加强服务贸易竞争力更是势在必行的要务，我国理应针对服务贸易的不足制定对应的对策。43774

毕业论文关键词： 金砖国家；服务贸易；竞争力发展；对策建议

Comparative Study in service trade competitiveness and development of BRICS

Summary: In December 2010, after the BRICS joint decision-making, South Africa is agreed to join in BRICS. Today, economic globalization is deepening, "BRIC countries" is the main representative of the world's emerging economies, and it is also a guider for developing countries, so gradually catch the eyes of countries around the world. After the BRICS obtaining better development, their international status is rising, meanwhile, the differences of services trade still exist. As BRICS’ economics achieved rapid development and the foreign trade has been expanded better, national trade competitive situations have been changed. According to the real development in service trade of BRICS, this paper selects the total amount of trade services, TC index etc. to analyze their international competitiveness from different perspectives. The final results showed that India is the most competitive in BRICS, China ranked the middle,  South Africa's hidden ability is very strong, and the rest two countries’ progress are extremely slow. China's service trade shows urgent need to enhance and further strengthen the competitiveness. Our country should formulate corresponding countermeasures against inadequate services trade.

Keywords: BRICS; service trade; competitiveness development; suggestions 

目  录

一、绪论 1

（一） 研究目的和意义 1

（二）文献综述 1

（三）主要研究内容 3

二、服务贸易的相关知识 4

（一）服务贸易含义 4

（二）“金砖国家”服务贸易发展合作的相关理论 4

（三）服务贸易竞争力的衡量指标 5

（1）服务贸易总量 5

（2）国际市场占有率 5

（3）服务贸易竞争力指数 5

（4）显示性比较优势指数(RCA) 6

三、金砖国家服务贸易竞争力比较研究 7

（一）服务贸易总量比较 7

（二）国际市场占有率比较 8

（三）竞争优势指数（TC指数）比较 9

（四）显示性比较优势指数(RCA)分析