摘要:随着近代组织分工合作的生产方式盛行,同样的方式也被应用于文化产品的生产 之中,文化工业随之兴盛发展起来。但是,在上世纪 40 年代法兰克福学派的学者们在第 一时间接触到新兴的文化工业后却对其采取了一种批判的态度,在他们的眼中文化工业 催生的是一系列伪造成艺术的产品和生活方式。而生活在这一生产方式下作为消费者的 大众,在前所未有地接触文化生活的同时却并没有得到真正的文化启蒙。那么在当今的语 境下看文化工业除了在对人的生活产生引导作用之外是否仍然在发挥着不显明的消极作 用,而这一问题又将如何消除呢?本文则尝试承接法兰克福学派的理论视角对当代的文 化工业继续进行社会学,哲学的批判审视。作为人们日常生活中的一部分,文化工业所制 造的产品和生活方式消耗了人们对于自己现实生活的思考和关心,成为文化工业制作者 同化大众思想,塑造统一市场需求的工具。但是其技术和制造的生产方式却也因为时代的 变化发生了积极转变,从而部分地脱离出在阿多诺时代文化工业自身的缺点,使得不同的 人和主体可以成为文化工业的制造者,文化工业技术和相关资源也变成了大众自身创作 和服务的平台。66295

毕业论文关键字:阿多诺;法兰克福学派;文化工业批判;当代启蒙

Re - examination of Cultural Industry

—— Begin with Adorno 's "The Cultural Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception"

Abstract: With the modern production and pision of labor in the production mode of popular, the same way is also used in the production of cultural products, cultural industry flourished with the development. However, in the 1940s, the Frankfurt School scholars in the first time after exposure to the emerging cultural industries have taken a critical attitude to it, in their eyes the birth of the cultural industry is a series of artifacts made of art products and lifestyle. And living

in this mode of production as a consumer of the public, in an unprecedented contact with cultural life at the same time but did not get a real cultural enlightenment. Then in today's context to see the cultural industry in addition to the role of life in the guide whether it is still playing a negative role is not obvious, and this problem will be how to eliminate it? This paper attempts to undertake the Frankfurt School of the theoretical perspective of the contemporary cultural industry to continue the sociological, philosophical critical review. As part of the daily life of the people, the products and lifestyles made by the cultural industry consume the thinking and care for their real life, and become the tool for the cultural industry producers to assimilate the public and create a unified market demand. But its technology and manufacturing methods of production but also because of the changes in the times have undergone a positive change, which in part from the Adorno era of cultural industry itself shortcomings, making different people and the main body can become the cultural industry manufacturers, culture Industrial technology and related resources has become a public self-creation and service platform.

Keywords: Adorno;Frankfurt School;Criticism of Cultural Industry; Contemporary enlightenment

目录

导言 5

一、问题提出 5

二、研究综述 5

三、本文的研究进路 6

正文 7

一、阿多诺对于文化工业的早期批判 7

二、对于文化工业再次进行审视的必要性

上一篇:中国古代玉剑饰研究
下一篇:中国古代人形玉器研究

试论微文化背景下的文学碎片化现象

从中国古代的食器看古代饮食文化

空空道人评点《红楼梦》文化创意思想述论

空空道人评点《三国演义》文化创意思想述论

从清代“西湖竹枝词”论杭州民俗文化

论《文心雕龙》中的草木意象

新闻报道文体中没错的话语标记功能

我国风险投资的发展现状问题及对策分析

网络语言“XX体”研究

安康汉江网讯

互联网教育”变革路径研究进展【7972字】

老年2型糖尿病患者运动疗...

LiMn1-xFexPO4正极材料合成及充放电性能研究

麦秸秆还田和沼液灌溉对...

新課改下小學语文洧效阅...

ASP.net+sqlserver企业设备管理系统设计与开发

张洁小说《无字》中的女性意识