摘 要本研究采用问卷调查和文献研究的方式，利用自编的问卷调查了杭州师范大学小学教育

（全科）专业师范生、定向地区小学的领导、专科教师、小学生和家长对全科教师的看法， 并对比分析了小学全科和专科教师的培养方案，得出如下结果：全科师范生的培养目标更强 调基础性，培养要求更具全面性，课程设置更注重艺术修养;大部分全科师范生喜欢现在的 专业，但对用人单位让其担任多门学科的期待值并不高;用人单位对全科培养方式有期待， 但对授课科目数量有分歧，对单位现实需求有争议，对全科教师态度有要求;专科教师对工 作配合有期待，但对授课方式有争议;学生和家长接受度较差，对授课内容数量有侧重。在 此基础上提出促进小学全科教师职业融入的一些建议。88763

This study adopts questionnaire survey and literature research method, using the self-made questionnaire of Hangzhou normal university primary school education (general) major students, directional area elementary school, college teachers, primary school students and the leadership of the view of general teachers, parents and general analysis of the general teachers and college teachers' training scheme, it is concluded that the following results: the general students' training target more emphasis on basic, more comprehensive training requirements, curriculum pay more attention to artistic accomplishment; Most general students like professional now, but let it serve as to unit of choose and employ persons the multi-discipline expectations are not high; Unit of choose and employ persons have expectation mode of general practice training, but the number of teaching subjects have differences, controversial demand for unit reality, the general teachers attitude requirements; College teachers have expect to

work with, but the controversial teaching mode; Students and parents poor acceptance, have focus on the number of lectures。 Based on this, some suggestions to promote the general elementary school teachers' career into are advances。

关键词：小学; 全科教师; 职业融入

Keyword: Primary school; General teachers; Professional in

目 录

一、研究背景 5

（一）国内外相关研究综述 5

1。全科师范生专业认同研究 5

2。全科师范生就业问题研究 5

3。全科教师职业融入问题研究 6

（二）相关概念的界定 7

（三）研究目的和意义 8

二、研究对象与方法 8

（一）研究对象 8

（二）研究方法 8

（三）数据统计法 9

三、研究结果与分析 9

（一）全科和专科师范生源Q于D优G尔X论V文Y网wwW.yOueRw.com 原文+QQ75201`8766 培养方案对比情况 9

1。培养目标的异同 9

2。培养要求的区别 9

3。课程设置的差异 10

（二）在校全科师范生相关问题调研 11

1。在读全科生的专业认同调查分析 11

2。在读全科生的职业预期调查分析